Skip to main content

Full text of "Robust and optimal laser cooling of trapped ions"

See other formats


Robust and optimal laser cooling of trapped ions 



J. CcrrilloQ A. Rctzkcr, and M. B. Plcnio 

Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College London, SW7 2PG, UK and 
QOLS, The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Rd., SW7 2BW, UK 

We present a robust and fast laser cooling scheme suitable for trapped atoms and ions. Based 
on quantum interference, generated by a special laser configuration, it is able to rapidly cool the 
system such that the final phonon occupation vanishes to zeroth order in the Lamb-Dicke parameter 
in contrast to existing cooling schemes. Furthermore, it is robust under conditions of fluctuating 
laser intensity and frequency, thus making it a viable candidate for experimental applications. 



OS 

o 
o 

(N 



^— > ■ 

c ■ 
a ■ 

=5 

cr 



> 

SO 
00 

in 
o 

Os 
O 



X 



Introduction — Laser cooling is a crucial ingredient 
for probing quantum properties of matter 
is a key factor in a wide variety of experiments ranging 
from Bosc- Einstein condensates and quantum computing 
to quantum simulation with atoms and ions. Variants 
of coolingschemes range from Doppler cooling for free 
particles m and its partner, side band cooling for bound 
particles 5|, @| , to dark state cooling schemes for free Q 
and bound particles 0] relying on quantum interference 
which arises thanks to their non-trivial internal electronic 
structures. 

At present, sideband cooling is the method of choice 
for trapped ions. It is a necessary requirement for effi- 
cient cooling that motional sidebands with frequency v 
can be resolved, i.e., the linewidth of the optical tran- 
sition 7 <C v. Cooling is then achieved by the red side- 
band transition which excites the atom while at the same 
time annihilating a phonon to ensure energy conserva- 
tion. This transition rate must be higher than that on the 
carrier and blue sideband transitions that heat the sys- 
tem either through recoil after spontaneous decay (car- 
rier) or coherent generation of a phonon (blue sideband). 
The selection of the red transition is ensured by the ro- 
tating wave approximation, i.e. energy conservation, as 
long as the Rabi frequency fl of the laser satisfies £1 <C v. 
One method to suppress the carrier and blue sideband 
transitions employs destructive interference exhibited for 
example in dark states For this reason, Electromag- 
netically Induced Transparency (EIT) [§] has become an 
inspiration for a variety of proposed laser cooling schemes 
for trap ped ions such as EIT cooling [n| and Stark-shift 
cooling llj. In EIT cooling, interference eliminates the 
carrier transition to improve cooling performance while 
in the Stark-shift scheme this is achieved in a rotated 



sorption spectrum, while constraining the blue sideband 
to a region with negligible absorption, thus achieving low 
final temperatures. The final state of the system is then 



basis in a suitable interaction picture 12 1. 

In EIT cooling the existence of a dark state of 
a three level system allows final temperatures below 
fvy/kB- This is achieved in a three level scheme subject 
to Raman lasers with strong blue single-photon detuning 
that couple both the ground state and a meta-stable state 
to an excited dissipative state. Among the dressed states 
of the system there is one dark state that cancels the car- 
rier transition. Well chosen parameters, can center the 
red sideband transition under a peak of the Fano-like ab- 



p (B/T) = \dark)(dark\ ® V]a n |n)(n| + o(r/ 2 



(1) 



where \dark) is the internal level steady state and \n) 
are the number states of the external degrees of free- 
dom (dof), with a final mean phonon number of order 
( 7 /4|A|) 2 0. 

In Stark-shift cooling [ll[ on the other hand one laser 
drives transitions between the ground and a meta-stable 
state and another two resonant Raman lasers couple a 
superposition of both to the excited state. This first 
laser generates Rabi oscillations between the dark state 
and the orthogonal bright state. If the coupling is cor- 
rectly tuned, the oscillations will also involve neigh- 
boring mechanical levels so that states \dark) \n) and 
\bright) \n — 1) are coupled while carrier transitions are 
eliminated. As the EIT scheme, Stark-shift cooling 
achieves a final temperature that is in leading order in- 
dependent of the Lamb-Dicke parameter 77. 

It is now natural to ask whether these schemes can 
be combined to reach vanishing temperature in lead- 
ing order in the Lamb-Dicke parameter. As this work 
demonstrates, this is indeed possible. We present here 
a novel cooling scheme, a judicious combination of EIT 
and Stark-shift cooling, which share the same dark state. 
This in turn allows for both the carrier and the blue side- 
band transitions, and hence heating, to be suppressed by 
interference. As a result the final temperature, to zeroth 
order in the Lamb-Dicke parameter, vanishes. To the 
best of our knowledge this is the first scheme that is able 
to achieve this for trapped particles. 

That the combination of EIT and Stark-shift cooling 
is successful, may seem surprising. A classical analy- 
sis would lead one to expect that the efficiency of the 
combined scheme to be the arithmetical average of the 
individual ones. It is the quantum nature of the inter- 
action however that makes them interfere constructively 
in such a way as to outperform its constituent schemes. 
The quantum interference can be designed to completely 
cancel the two leading heating processes in the system 



2 




FIG. 1: A three level structure made up of \gi) and \g2) and 
an excited dissipative state |e) which decays at rate 7. The 
ground levels are coupled to the excited state by a pair of 
Raman beams under a detuning A whose Rabi frequencies 
are Q.a and mechanically interact with the ion with opposite 
Lamb-Dicke parameters ija- The ground levels are directly 
coupled by an effective Rabi frequency Qb and a Lamb-Dicke 
parameter t]b. 

resulting in the state 

p (robust) = | dflrfc ^ ^ arfc | ^ | ) (0| + ( 7 f) (2) 

with a final temperature that vanishes in leading order 
in the Lamb-Dicke parameter. Remarkably we will also 
demonstrate that the scheme also exhibits a significant 
improvement with regards to the stability under fluctuat- 
ing laser intensities. This implies that it remains robust 
under general experimental conditions, thus assuring its 
feasibility. 

Description of robust cooling - The combined scheme, 
as presented in fig. [TJ involves a trapped ion with an in- 
ternal electronic structure made up of a ground state and 
a metastable state \gi) and | (72) and an excited dissipa- 
tive state |e). For simplicity, we will refer to the coupling 
between the lower states \gi) and | (72) as "SSh coupling" 
and between the g-manifold and the excited state |e) as 
"EIT couplings" . A harmonic well models the trap po- 
tential. It is characterized by its equally spaced levels |n) 
representing the Fock state of n phonons and the creation 
and annihilation operators b and b^ . Stark-shift and EIT 
coolings can be regarded as particular instances of this 
scheme when t]a — > and — > respectively. 

The quantum theory of laser cooling of trapped parti- 
cles was developed in [l3|, 14, 15| and we will follow the 



notation in |15| . Expanding the Hamiltonian up to first 
order in the Lamb-Dicke parameters, it can be split into 
three contributions, the trap potential and the internal 
dof: 



H = vb^b - 2J Si \gi) (g l \ , 



(3) 



where are S^s are the detunings with respect to the lasers. 
The interaction of the laser beams with the ion due to 
the EIT part: 



H 



EIT 



n A «< e + << e ) + «< e - of •«) (b + &t) ( 4 ) 



and the interaction of the laser beams with the ion due 
to the Stark-shift part: 

Hssh = finof > g *v A Vt A + '//;<?/,<;•"<••■:/, + (5) 



where a 



(m,n) 



= (\m)(n\ + h.c.) and a y m,n ^ = 
(i\m) (n\ + h.c). 

The physics of the scheme can best be understood by 
extending the analysis of the steady state Eq.© to the 
next order in the Lamb-Dicke parameter. By inspection 
of the Hamiltonian one can consider the following non- 
normalized pure state: 

l*> = - <72>|0) -it]B\gi +52)|1) + o(r l 2 ) (6) 

Under the effect of the EIT couplings (Eq. [4j both terms 
of the superposition interfere destructively and as a re- 
sult | I F) remains invariant. However |\&) is not invariant 
under the free Hamiltonian (Eq. ([3])) which introduces a 
phase shift between the two components. For a suitable 
tuned parameters, the Stark shift coupling part (Eq. [5]) 
can cancel the effect of the free Hamiltonian and as a 
consequence \^f) will be a dark state of the Liouvillian as 
it does not suffer any spontaneous emission losses cither. 
This is achieved when 



o, 



(7) 



From an experimental point of view, it is worth noting 
that this resonance condition is characterized by the quo- 
tient of the Lamb-Dicke parameters. These can be set up 
at the beginning of the experiment to a high precision. 

Losses from the excited level are incorporated in the 
master equation: 



at 



H EIT + H SShlP }+C d p 



(8) 



where C d contains the spontaneous emission of the ex- 
cited level: 



C d = 



E 



le,i^i,ePe,i<^e,i ~ PO~e,e ~ G e ,eP (9) 



where Uj^k = \j) (k\ and ~p ~\ dxe lkx pe~ lkx . 

After expansion of the rest of the terms up to second 
order in the Lamb-Dicke parameter and adiabatic elimi- 
nation of the internal dof we find the rate equation: 



7 n,n 

a Pext 17 1 iw a ri+l.n+1 a n,n\ 

= \\n + l){A-p ext - A +Pe < xt ) 



dt 



/ a n — l,n—l 
n \ A +Pext 



A -Pext)\ 



In the spirit of [15( the rates A± can be expressed 
A± = 2Re[D + S(tv)} 



(10) 



111) 



where D is the diffusion coefficient due to spontaneous 
emission from the excited atomic states. Here D = as 



3 



3.5 



2.5 



0.5 - 





'7.4 



i-©.io 



-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 



FIG. 3: Expected value of occupation (n) as a function of the 
Lamb-Dicke parameter quotient and of variations around the 
optimal Rabi frequency £Ib , where it is shown how variations 
have a worse effect as r\A vanishes, that is, as the Stark-shift 
cooling regime is approached. 



FIG. 2: The deviation of the analytical from the exact nu- 
merical results in the final population is plotted versus the 
deviation in Qb (in units of trap frequency) from the optimal 
operating point for different Lamb-Dicke parameters. 



the population of the excited states vanishes due to the 
dark state nature of the final state. S(v) is the fluctua- 
tion spectrum of Heisenberg operator F(t): 



S( V ) 



1 



2Mv 



dte wt (F(t)F(0)} 



(12) 



a y ie ~ a y 2e and 



where F = Feit + Fssh and Feit 
Fssh = TiB^B^y 192 are the part in the interaction Hamil- 
tonian Eq. 0] and Eq. [5] that multiply 6 + fe T . The aver- 
age can be calculated using the quantum regression the- 
orem. We may decompose the operator F into compo- 
nents of EIT and Stark-shift so that the overall heat- 
ing rate can then be split into three parts: the EIT 
part A+ IT , the Stark-shift part A+ Sh and interaction be- 
tween EIT and the Stark-shift part AT* for the remain- 

(r, A (v + 2{l B )) 2 /V, 



ing cases. Their results are: A+ IT 

j^SSh 



- (f]B^Br/V and A 
where ^ 



-2r lA r lB (v+2VL B )Sl B /V 



2fiir 



T> r 2 (i/+2J2 B ) 2 + (-2n^ + (iy+20 B )(A+iy+0 B )) 2 

A+ = \i lA { v + 2n B )-i lB n B ] 2 /V 



Then 



(13) 



which will be identically zero for the condition in Eq.([7]). 
This emphasizes the role of the interaction between the 
EIT and Stark-shift cooling in order to assure the ground 
state is populated with probability 1 . The mean occupa- 



tion number n is given by 



- , thus yielding 



it 



0. 



A--A+ ■ 

Fig. [2] shows the numerical results of the approach to the 
(n) = point as the Lamb Dicke parameter goes to zero. 

Robustness — The constructive interference between 
EIT and Stark-shift contribution is also crucial for under- 
standing the robustness of the scheme under fluctuating 
parameters. If the Rabi-frcqucncies deviate from Eq.0 



by, Afl A / B , the final populations as 

(n) oc {An A ) 4 (An B ) 2 



(14) 



instead of second order as is usually the case. As is exem- 
plified in fig. [3J under a given value of the fluctuations of 
the laser intensities, the final mean occupation decreases 
abruptly as one moves away of the Stark-shift only or EIT 
only regimes. This guarantees promising performance 
under real experimental conditions, overcoming the main 
drawback of the previous dark-state cooling schemes. 

Rate — The interference structure of this scheme is 
also essential for the high cooling rate W = A_ — A + . 
For the resonance condition eq. ([7]) we find 



W 



8Tr,j 



+ (i/-2n B )(A 



n B )y + r 2 (v 



2tt B y 

(15) 

£l B is the only Rabi frequency involved in the condition 
Eq.©. As a function of fl B , Eq. (fT5"l) takes the approx- 
imate shape of a squared Lorentzian, with a peak close 
to fl B = v/2 at which point the cooling rate expression 
reduces to 



W 



(16) 



This is also an optimal point for Stark-shift cooling [ll| 
but it should be noted that the cooling rate of Robust 
cooling is slightly higher than that of Stark-shift cool- 
ing. Since the internal dynamics should be much faster 
than the external one for the perturbation approach to 
work the analytic result is not valid for VL A < r/ A v, which 
means that the cooling can be as fast as 1 order of mag- 
nitude less than the trap frequency. Since the final state 
(eq. [6]) is a pure state up to second order in the Lamb- 
Dicke parameter there is a simple unitary rotation such 
that the final state has vanishing number of phonons to 
fourth order in the Lamb Dicke parameter. 

Implementation — The way the effective fl B and r] B 
couplings can be physically implemented is not unique. 



4 



One way is to use two lasers to create the EIT cooling 
part and to use magnetic gradients for the Stark- 
shift part. In this system the magnetic gradients create 
a coupling of the following type: Xa z (b + b'), where A is 
proportional to the magnetic gradients and the TLS is 
driven using a microwave: £ldO~ x cos Wdt, where ild corre- 
sponds to the Rabi frequency of the driving and Ud to the 
driving frequency. After a polaron transformation the re- 
sulting Hamiltonian is exactly as in Eq. [5] when the Rabi 
frequency is replaced by fid and the Lamb Dicke param- 
eter is replaced by K 

This scheme can be especially useful to cool nano scale 
resonators, by using the setup described in [17|. In this 



setup an NV center is coupled to a diamond cantilever, 
the coupling is achieved by magnetic gradients resulting 
in the same Hamiltonian as described above. In can- 
tilevers the speed of cooling is very important due to the 
finite Q value, which is an important factor limiting the 
achievable final temperatures at present. The high cool- 
ing rate achieved by the described scheme will result in 
lower final temperatures bringing us closer to the goal of 
achieving the quantum regime in cantilever systems. 

Alternatively, one can also use Raman beams with 
large single-photon detuning to couple levels \gi) and 
| (72 ) - By adiabatically eliminating the upper level the re- 
lationships between our effective parameters fls and tjb 
and the physical values Q p and r\ v are found to be £Ib = 



ft 2 
p 



A 



2A^ 



and flBTjB = ^pVp A{A^-l'i) 
Neglecting the rf 1 correction in the first expression we find 
Vb = Vphys ^"r^ wmcn yields r] B = 2n p for sufficiently 



large detunings. 

If we chose the optimal point for the cooling rate and 
fluctuations Qb = f , the condition becomes r} p jr\A = 4. 
This can be achieved for a layout where beam B is col- 
inear to the trap axis and the beam A is 60° away from 
the axis. Even if the optimal situation is for an angle 
separation of 60°, the robustness of the scheme ensures 
excellent performance for any geometrical configuration. 
Proposed experimental layouts [2(| use vacuum cham- 
bers with windows at 22.5° and/or 45° from the trap 
axis, which generally allow for an angle range of about 
±10°. Taking 45° as an operating value, the Lamb-Dickc 
parameter quotient becomes kb/va = 2y/2. Different 
optimal set of parameters can be obtained for this situ- 
ation depending on whether the cooling rate or the final 
temperature want to be optimized. For the latter, con- 
dition Eq.0 has to be observed, ft a = 0.6^ and A ~ 0. 
This will assure an extremely stable cooling rate which is 
generally 2 orders of magnitude smaller than EIT cooling 
but still better than sideband cooling. This final result 
can be improved depending on the particular values of 
the transition lincwidth T. On the contrary, if the cool- 
ing rate is to be enhanced, condition Eq.((7|) won't be 
satisfied. In particular, for £Ia — 0.4z/, £1b ~ 0.45^ with 
5% fluctuation and A ~ — 2v the population can still be 



as low as 10 _3 while having a cooling rate several orders 
of magnitude over that of EIT cooling. Taking into ac- 
count the fact that angles up to 55° are accessible the 
cooling rate can still be improved by up to two orders of 
magnitude. 

Multi mode cooling — Finally, the cooling scheme has 
also been tested for an ion chain using Monte Carlo sim- 
ulation 



It 



191 ]. The robustness of the scheme implies a 
wide range of operational Rabi frequencies or, in a dif- 
ferent perspective, a wide range of trap frequencies for 
a given Rabi frequency. Thus, a particular central mode 
frequency can be addressed so that also the neighboring 
modes benefit from the cooling. In a multi-mode environ- 
ment with up to 3 ions promising results have been ob- 
tained and a detailed study will be presented elsewhere. 

Conclusion — To conclude, we have introduced a cool- 
ing scheme that cools to zero temperature without any 
corrections in zeroth order in the Lamb Dicke parameter. 
Beyond the academic interest of proving the existence of 
such a scheme, its robustness makes it extremely attrac- 
tive for experimental realizations. 

Acknowledgment — J. C. acknowledges support from 
the AXA Research Fund. A.R. acknowledges the support 
of EPSRC project number EP/E045049/1 and MBP ac- 
knowledges support from the Royal Society and the EU 
STREP project HIP. 



[9 
[10 

[11 
[12 

[13 
[14 
[15 



Electronic address: j.cerrillo@imperial.ac.uk 
S. Chu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 685 (1998). 

C. N. Cohen- Tannoudji, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 707 (1998). 
W. D. Phillips, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 721 (1998). 

T. Hansch and A. Schawlow, Opt. Commun 13, 68 
(1975). 

D. Wineland and H. Dehmelt, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 20, 
637 (1975). 

D. J. Wineland, R. E. Drullinger, and F. L. Walls, Phys. 
Rev. Lett. 40, 1639 (1978). 

A. Aspect, E. Arimondo, R. Kaiser, N. Vansteenkiste, 
and C. Cohen- Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 826 
(1988). 

R. Dum, P. Marte, T. Pellizzari, and P. Zoller, Phys. 
Rev. Lett. 73, 2829 (1994). 

M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Rev. 
Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005). 

G. Morigi, J. Eschner, and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 
85, 4458 (2000). 

A. Retzker and M. B. Plenio, New J. of Phys. 9, 279 
(2007). 

D. Jonathan, M. B. Plenio, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. 
A 62, 042307 (2000). 

M. Lindberg and J. Javanainen, J. Opt. Soc. B 3, 1008 
(1986). 

J. Javanainen and S. Stenholm, Applied Physics A 24, 
151 (1981). 

J. I. Cirac, R. Blatt, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 46, 2668 
(1992). 



5 



[16] F. Mintert and C. Wunderlich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 
257904 (2001). 

[17] P. Rabl, P. Cappellaro, M. V. G. Dutt, L. Jiang, J. R. 

Maze, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. B 79, 041302 (2009). 
[18] K. Molmer, Y. Castin, and J. Dalibard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 



B 10, 524 (1993). 
[19] M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 
(1998). 

[20] personal communication with K. Singer and T. Schatz.